ONE CALL FOUR SIDES
november 1 (premiere) in the Hall in Farsta
also performed november 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23
book your free ticket HERE

inside the frame, at odds with her own framing
one single call, repeatedly contemplated
choreography Cristina Caprioli / light Thomas Zamolo / sound Richard Chartier
dance Samuel Draper, A. Livingstone, Pontus Pettersson, Adam Shütt / Tom Caley, Annika Hyvärinen, Petter Jacobsson / Nelia Naumanen
When dancing stands at the edge, progress in compliance no longer counts. Fear and frenzy nowhere to be found. And that which used to run the show lose all credit. No one and no thing believe anymore. Dancing alone no longer must carry your responsibility.
Unburden at last, she rests in her orbit and falls into blind sensing.
Did you know the minute shift of a slow foxtrot? Would you step inside the split? Set a pavement, bend a title?
lost sight of time? twinkled at a hint? Have we ever recognized her mood and held her by her hand?
Quiet, vibrant at heart, dancing moves undisposed.
A different choreography comes to display. Visionary without promise. Boundless in the already exhausted.
In contrast to the current hysterical, oh so static pursuit of increased measure of fast-food entertainment, ONE CALL FOUR SIDES calls for a reset and walks a different grid. Combative in gratuity. Graceful in the uncanny. Transient. Affirmative.
Through and past our proud eyes.
ONE CALL FOUR SIDES reflects upon stillness and absence. Remains on one single track and pays attention to the fine print modulation of one single move, in a state of exhaustion with no lack. The dancing comes forth in a series of four: the fox, the spoon, the split, the pavement. In overlap and apart. Coupled up and left behind. Already over THE MOON right down THE SQUARE.
The work has been supported by a preceding short note on orbits.
about orbits (aka one golden lion award allegory
Monday, April 8, 3:28 p.m., behind the clouds, partial, almost total solar eclipse. All the people are cheering in flocks, and yes, it is touching to watch the moon as she moves herself into the spotlight. Half an inch at a time, slow and steady, she overshadows the sun and stands in the center of attention. Not out of spite or to upgrade her position, but because she is not ready to give up her trajectory. Even when it takes her far out of her league, she won’t deny her path as it overlaps with other paths. Not even when it takes her too close to the mighty sun (or so it seems from my distant view). Either way, once in place, she doesn’t bide her time and moves on. As if the whole ordeal was nothing more than the kind of everyday intrusion that happens once every 20 years or so. This said, in the short time she spends in the spotlight, she seems content with her position, happy to finally be able to turn the bright light onto her into a darkness onto us.
Call me romantic, but the whole thing makes me happy, as if it were proof of a possible turnover.
Even if only for a minute.
cc 2024
THE MOON
noetic countdown faint displacement
I came to see what was there / she looks at what is fading and lingers the value that remains
Under the moon, the indifferent pavement. Edged in displaced pieces.
Pieces to blend with things at hand. Singular things ready to be assembled.
Vigilant in blindness. Vibrant in inertia. The dancing falls in contemplation of a stillness that pose no questions, in a darkness with no exceptions, in an absence with no lack. As if absence were the most important move, stillness the decisive enlightenment. In step with the gradual displacement of a horizon, we sense all the thread-thin shifts of value that make this eclipse so incredibly saturated and at the same time so blatantly lucid.
THE SQUARE
visceral incitement reticent madness
you came to stay / they see the damage that is being done and cultivate the dignity that prevails
In the middle of the square, despite the absence, all things spread out in unattended disorder.
Exhausted things, farsighted in inverted disappointment. In pieces, split into pieces. Corpses, piled up in untenable piles.
Then again. Once gone, dancing can always be recalled. One single call, and she is back in sight. Sharper than ever, with no promise of progress. No demands for improvement. Like a collection of down-played creatures, splayed out open, scattered over the uneven terrain. In circumstantial motion. As if dancing were not crucial but downright indecent. As if moving not only were of no use but in fact harmful. The dancing ceases to perform in her own right, to instead act as a hyphen between cause and speculation. Tearing herself apart in favor of a trespass oblique, where she lingers in doubtless gaps. You are moved by the inner cut, see the barely suggested. We step over a sensory threshold. And along with the razor-sharp dancing, we sense all the finely coiled layers that make this inversion so incredibly tender and at the same time so daring.
In contrast to the current hysterical, oh so static pursuit of unlimited growth of predetermined profit, this incitement proclaims a radical transgression. In the dance, for the dance. In the singular common.
The term noetic comes from the Greek word noēsis / noētikos which means inner vision, direct knowledge, intuition or implicit understanding. William James, the American philosopher and psychologist, defined noetic experiences as “states of knowledge”.
A sensation is the reaction of a sense organ to a stimulus. Sensation is the conversion of the nerve impulses formed at the end of signal transduction (a cascade of chemical reactions in a sense cell that begins with the activation of a receptor) into neural signals that can be interpreted by the brain. This interpretation is called perception, and in psychology sensation is therefore not the same thing as perception, even if the concepts are often used synonymously in common language. It is very difficult (if even possible) to experience a pure sensation the brain is quick to interpret the direction and then the sensation becomes perception. The sensation diminishes with repeated or long-term exposure to the same stimulus (so-called habituation or adaptation). When attention to the sensation is low or absent, that is, when impressions are registered in the unconscious, the impression is called subliminal perception. The level at which stimuli are too weak to be perceived is called sensory thresholds.